• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Common English Errors

Common Errors/Mistakes in English

  • Please Find Attached
  • Since 2 Years or For 2 Years?
  • Past Year or Last Year?

Grammar

Grammar

How to Use Quantifiers with Uncountable Nouns

Blame it on the learning process and the social dynamics, many people tend to mix up countable nouns and uncountable nouns in their daily communications. If you frequent social media on a daily basis, you would see many examples of such mix-up.

Here are some examples:

They have a lot of furnitures in their house.

Where are your luggages?

The website doesn’t have enough contents.

You need to understand the context of nouns in order to avoid these mistakes. It will also help you use right quantifiers before the nouns.

Let’s understand the difference between countable nouns and uncountable nouns beyond text book definitions.

Traffic, Water, Feedback, Hair, Content

What is the most common attribute among the above words?

You’re right – we can’t count or quantify these nouns.

For example, we can’t use them in the following ways:

The website doesn’t get many traffics.

A few hairs on your head have grown grey.

In a given context, the word ‘traffic’ is synonymous with ‘visitors’. However, they don’t always carry the same quantifiers before them.

For example:

How many visitors does your website get in a month?

How much traffic does your website get in a month?

Similarly,

I used to get a large number of visitors to my site.

I used to get a lot of traffic to my site.

You need to understand the context of new words in order to use them with correct quantifiers. Therefore, it’s highly recommended that you look up their meaning and usage in a dictionary.

Once you’re able tell whether a word is countable or uncountable noun, use the following list from Edufind to use the right quantifier:

Quantifiers used only with uncountable nouns:

A little, a bit of, a great deal of, a large amount of.

Quantifiers used with all types of nouns:

No, none, not any, some, any, a lot of, lots of, plenty of.

Quantifiers used only with countable nouns:

A few, a number of, several, a great number of, a large number of.

The Take Away

#1: You can’t make some uncountable nouns plural by adding “s” after them. For example, feedback. You should never say, “feedbacks”. If you want to quantify feedback, say, “some feedback, any feedback, much feedback, lots of feedback”.

#2: You should use correct quantifiers before uncountable nouns for them to make sense. For example, you should never say, “a large amount of feedback, a number of feedback, several feedback, a few feedback”. Say, “lots of feedback, little feedback, no feedback.”

Recommended Reading:

# Many a Time or Many a Times?

# Content vs Contents

9 years ago [postview]

Grammar

How to Use the Correct Tense with Conditional If Clause

Using incorrect tense with “conditional if clause” is one of the many common English errors that are prevalent in India. The prevalence of such errors is understandable since English is a second language in India and the occurrence of conditional if clauses is so rare that people don’t usually stand corrected or learn from the erroneous English usage. [Read more…] about How to Use the Correct Tense with Conditional If Clause

9 years ago [postview]

Grammar

Tips to Use Personal Pronoun – Singular They

Some authors tend to use “her” when they want to speak about a third person in their sentences.

For ex:

The truth is that when the title of the top result doesn’t immediately grab the searcher as a sure thing to fulfill her search need, she will begin looking for other clues in the other results.

Source: Moz.com (My favorite SEO blog)

I Googled it to know how people around the world look at this usage and, discovered the following discussion at Stack Exchange.

http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48/is-there-a-correct-gender-neutral-singular-pronoun-his-versus-her-versus

Although they are talking about using alternative to Singular They, which I am familiar with, nobody mentioned the aforementioned scenario.

Neither Wikipedia or Oxford seems to have categorically mentioned the above scenario where authors tend to use “she”.

Does that mean they writer is being sexist in the above example because he is not complying with the prevalent practices with regards to Singular They?

I personally would prefer “her/him” but when I have to use only one, then it shall be “her” – in instances when the person is doing something normal or good, and “him” when the person is supposedly at an evil act. For example, I would write in the following manner –

1. Drobo is a decent backup plan for an IT administrator when she has to ensure data safety for her clients.

2. War is a vicious solution devised by man to meet his unending greed.

That is how you challenge sexism.

Increasingly people are using “hir” in place of his/her because gender is more than just two. That is fine by me as well. There are a few other similar terms as well. But for the time being until the usage of alternative/invented pronouns are understood in context, I would prefer to use she/he when its a universal normative, just she, when its a normal act or good thing one does, and just he, when a person is doing something wrong.

As far as singular they is concerned that works on certain occasions only. Other than that, it would be an attempt to deny sexism. A similar example would be in case of married couples (anywhere in the world) where the liberal husband allows his wife to retain her surname by hyphenating it with his own…For example, a sexist man would expect his wife to use his surname after marriage, but a liberal husband would want his wife to use both their surnames.

But under no circumstances would any man change his surname to that of his wife’s. You get the logic? We should not cry sexism when we see women or their gender being duly recognized. We should cry sexism only rest of the time, because it’s still “a man’s world”.

 

11 years ago [postview]

Grammar

Please Find Attached: How to Mention Email Attachments

Please find attached or Please find the attached? Many people want to know the correct way of mentioning email attachments. So, let’s find out the correct way to mention email attachments.Here are different ways people write to mention email attachments.

Example #1: Please, find attached the report you asked for yesterday.

Example #2: Please, see the attached report for the budget estimate.

Example #3: Please, find the report attached.

In the examples above, there are two key components:

#1 – Position of the adjective “attached”

#2 – Use of the article “the”

Generally, an adjective is used before the noun in order to denote its attributes. For example, when you say “he’s a talented writer”, talented denotes the attribute of the noun (writer). However, in some cases, they use adjectives after nouns, e.g. “I want someone special”. When adjectives are used after nouns, they are known as “postpositive adjectives”. In modern business communications, the use of postpositive adjectives is rare. In fact, they are used to invoke a particular emotion. For example, “there are places unexplored”.

Therefore, some grammar purists wouldn’t approve of the following usage:

Please, find the report attached. (attached is a postpositive adjective here)

The other important point is the use of the article “the” in the examples above. As you already know, the article “the” is usually used to specify an object. Look at the two examples below:

#1 – I saw a cool bike yesterday.

#2 – I saw the cool bike again earlier today.  (use of “the” denotes a specific object)

Based on this grammar rule, Example #1 looks perfectly fine since the email sender is mentioning “the report” which the receiver has asked for.

In other words, the usage “find attached the report…” sounds acceptable in such a context.

Therefore, if you want to use “find attached the report”, make sure you add something that makes sense, e.g. “you asked for yesterday”.

Find the Attached vs See the Attached

Some people believe it should be “see the attached…” instead of “find the attached…” as using “find” might mean “to search for” in email communications. The notion is actually debatable since the word “Find” has several meanings. However, if you want to be safer, you can go with Example #2: “Please, see the attached report for budget estimate”. In this example, the use of article “the” is appropriate and the attached is used as an attributive adjective. In other words, it’s the most acceptable format of mentioning email attachments.

Variations of Example #2:

✅ Please, find the attached file for a better understanding.

✅ Please, find the attached file as per your request.

✅ Please, find the attached file you asked for.

✅ Please, find the attached file relevant to the case.

Some more examples:

Please find the attached file for your review

Please find the attached file for your request

Please find the attached file you requested

Please find attached the file you have requested

Please find the attached file for your reference

Please find attached file for your kind reference

Please find the attached file for your approval

Please find the attached file and let me know

Please find the attached file for my resume

Please see the attached file for my resume (informal)

Please see the attached file for details (informal)

Please see the attached file for your perusal (informal)

Please refer to the attached file for your perusal

Please refer to the attached file for your kind perusal

Please find the attached quotation for your perusal

Please find the attached invoice for your payment

Please find the attached file in this email

Please find the attached file herewith

Please find the attached document for your review

Please find the attached document for your records

Please find the attached documents for your signature

Please Find Attached vs Please Find Enclosed

Many people wonder if using the word “enclosed instead of “attached” would denote a more formal tone. But there’s nothing like that. “Enclosed” is used for physical mails whereas “attached” is appropriate for emails.

Alternatives to “Please Find Attached”

  • The attached diagram shows . . .
  • The attached spreadsheet contains . . .
  • When you review the attached proposal, you will notice . . .
  • As promised, I have attached a revised . . .
  • Please let me know if the attached draft . . .
  • Here is . . .
  • Enclosed are . . .
  • Attached is . . .
  • We have enclosed . . .
  • I have attached . . .
  • The attached proposal includes . . .
  • The enclosed document shows . . .
  • Please see attached…
  • Please review the attached diagram . . .
  • The attached spreadsheet covers . . .
  • Please use the enclosed envelope to . . .

So, remember the following rules for email attachments:

✅ “Please, find the attached file,” is more common in modern business communications. However, it’s NOT the only acceptable format.

✅ Always add context to the above format. For example, say “Please, find the attached file you requested yesterday.”

✅ When you don’t want to specify any particular file, avoid using “the”. You can simply write, “Please, find attached.” or its abbreviated form: PFA.

✅ “Attached” is the correct word for electronic communications. Enclosed is used for physical mails where envelopes are used. Don’t get confused.

✅ “Find” has more than one meaning. It doesn’t really mean you’re asking the recipient to search for something that is lost.

The rules of the English language are so complex that we often find many common errors in uncommon places. The problem is often compounded for the non-native English speakers who usually learn the language by assuming many things to be correct. Therefore, we see many people resorting to wrong usages in their everyday interactions.

Hopefully, you’ll find this guide useful.

11 years ago [postview]

Grammar

Common English Errors: Few, A Few and Quite a Few

Apart from Douchebaggery, there’s another thing that is hard to miss on Facebook: Poor Grammar.

Visit any Facebook Page and you will cringe at the degree of syntax errors people commit pretty innocently. One of those most frequently committed errors is the confusion between “Few” and “A Few”.

Don’t Say “Few” When You Mean “Some”

I have come across a lot of people who use “few” when they mean to say “some”.

Here’s one such example: “Few people will never change their behavior.”

In the above example, apparently, the person wants to say, “Some people will never change their behavior”.

Technically, the word “Few” suggests a small number of people or things. When we use the word “few”, we want to indicate that the number is smaller than what we expect or what is normally found in a particular situation.

For example, if you see only 5 to 10 students present in a classroom session for which 50 students have enrolled, you can say there are “few” students in this session.

Similarly, when we say there are few buyers for this product, we usually mean to indicate a number that is smaller than “our” expectations or that is generally expected in similar situations.

Some more examples of “few” would be as follows:

There were few spectators for the match. (meaning the stadium looked rather empty for its capacity)

There were few people in the street last evening. (meaning we usually see a larger number of people in the street during the evening everyday)

A Few = Not a Large Number

Compare the two sentences given below:

I have few friends who can help you with this. (meaning I have barely any friends who can help you or I have no friends who can help you with this)

I have a few friends who can help you with this. (meaning I have some/ a couple of friends who can help you with this)

Here’s another comparative example originally found on Stack Exchange.

“I have a few objections to the vendor’s proposed approach.”

This implies that I am not on board with the vendor’s proposal. I have some objections, but not so many as to say “I have several objections…”. Nevertheless, I have objections that need to be addressed.

“I have few objections to the vendor’s proposed approach.”

This is a more positive statement that implies I am more or less on board with the proposal. It is not a whole-hearted endorsement, but I barely have any objections at all.

You can read more about this here on Stack Exchange.

Quite a Few: Definition

The idiom “Quite a few” confuses many English learners from around the world because of the irony it holds. It is important to understand there are many idioms in English that originated from conventions rather than rules. This essentially means you cannot change their structure.

What “Quite a few” really means

Quite a few means a fairly large number of something. It is usually used in a relative sense, meaning more than what is expected in a usual scenario. To keep it simple, though, it is synonymous with a large amount/number, a huge amount/number, and a significant amount/number of something.

Here are some examples of “Quite a few”

Quite a few people: A large number of people.

For example, Quite a few people got the wrong impression.

Quite a few times: A significant number of times.

For example, I’ve seen this movie quite a few times and I know every dialogue by heart.

Quite a few years / Quite a few years ago: A long time / A long time ago.

For example, Quite a few years have passed since he got married. // I met him quite a few years ago so I may not recognize him now.

Quite a few of them: Most of them.

For example, Quite a few of them were corrupt and I couldn’t work with them for a long time.

Quite a bit: A fairly large amount.

For example, There’s quite a bit of snow on the ground.

“A Few” vs. “Quite a Few”

There is a very common expression “quite a few”, which is a trap for foreign learners because it looks like it could mean “rather few or very few”, but it does not.

“Quite a few” expresses that the speaker was impressed or astonished by the number, as they would have expected less. Or the speaker wants to emphasize the fact that it was “more than you would think”.

Look at the following example:

Quite a few people were seen at the sea shore despite the cyclone warning by the weather department.

In the above example, the speaker doesn’t mean that the beach was crowded. He only means that he hadn’t expected as many visitors at the sea shore on a day when the cyclone panic was endemic.

As stated in the example above, “Quite a few” is used only when a specific number (of people or things) are not expected in a given situation.

However, it has become quite common for people to use it to mean “many” or “a large number of”.

It means the exact opposite thing: “a large or significant number, or many”. So, saying “I have quite a few friends” is the same as saying “I have a lot of friends”.

You can read more about this phrase here on Stack Exchange.

Being a student you may experience some difficulty in grammar. So you can improve your grammar and writing skills by getting help from CustomWritings – English essay writing service and its professional academic writers.

11 years ago [postview]

Grammar

Would vs Would Have: How to Express Conditional Hypothesis

Before I begin, I would like to explain what hypothetical conditions actually mean. Hypothetical is something that isn’t real or just imaginary.

For example, in a sentence, “I wish I were a Spider-Man”, you imagine something that isn’t possible or real.

Sometimes, we want to express thoughts in a way that both talk about a hypothetical instance in relation to a condition.

Here’s an example:

“If I were a Spider-Man, I would fly everywhere”.

In the above example, the person expresses his wishes of flying everywhere on the condition of being a Spider-Man. To explain it further, his not being a Spider-Man negates his chances of flying.

Here’s another example:

If I had enough money, I would definitely buy this house. (You won’t buy this house because you don’t have enough money but you kind of wish you had enough money)

Note: Please, note that in the above examples, both conditions are in relation to the present time. Therefore, the use of “were” or “had” doesn’t say anything about the past.

While the above examples are based on the present hypothesis, there are situations when we express a conditional hypothesis that has relations with the past.

For example:

If I had worked harder, I would have made it to the top position in that company.

In the example above, you’re essentially talking about an outcome (you not making it to the top position) that didn’t happen because some conditions weren’t fulfilled, i.e., you working harder.

However, we can hear many speakers using the following structures these days.

  • #1 – If I would have worked harder, I would have made it to the top position in that company.
  • #2 – If I would have been in his position, I would have taken the right decision.

As a matter of fact, both these sentences are structurally ungrammatical.

The correct structures of these sentences should be as follows:

  • #1 – If I had worked harder, I would have made it to the top position in that company.
  • #2 – If I had been in his position, I would have taken the right decision.

Here’s a thread on Stack Exchange that explains this usage with more examples.

Sometimes, we talk about the conditional hypothesis which is related to both past and present life.

For example:

If I had saved enough money in my youth, I would be living a happier life.

In the example above, the speaker is apparently in his old age and wishing for something he can no longer perform. However, his present life is affected by his past action.

Here are some more examples:

If he hadn’t done well in the training courses, he wouldn’t be a Project leader now.

Note: The keyword is now. He is now the Project Leader but would not now be the Project Leader if he hadn’t done well.

Now, let’s compare the following examples:

  • Ex #1: If he hadn’t done well on the training courses, he wouldn’t be a Project leader now.
  • Ex #2: If he hadn’t done well on the training courses, he wouldn’t have been Project Leader.

(In the second example, the person is no longer the project leader in the company because he may no longer be working in the company)

Now, let’s compare the following examples:

  • Ex #1: If I had money, I would fly to Spain.
  • Ex #2: If I had had money, I would have flown to Spain.

(In the first example, the speaker is apparently financially weak but wishing for something hypothetical. Note that both instances belong to the present time.

In the second example, the speaker simply talks about his past. Note that both his actions belong to the past only.)

Here’s a question for you: Is the following sentence grammatically correct or wrong?

If I were a Spider-Man, I would have flown everywhere.

PS: Please, answer the question in the comment section below.

11 years ago [postview]

  • ← Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Next →

© 2026 Common English Errors · Built on Genesis · Privacy Policy · Sitemap · Contact

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.